05/24/2020
Alexxx
23 Reviews
Translated
Show original
Alexxx
Very helpful Review
10
Pretty good.
I would like to connect the first comment on this platform, which I value so highly, with a noble goal - and strive for a salvation for "New York Oud". Because I find it with a rating of just 7.1 most violently underrated. I do this for a very simple reason, because this sensual combination of roses and oud is one of my absolute favourite scents.
Of course, the scents of Bond No. 9 are not exactly bargains. They are often noisy and sometimes equally synthetic, olfactory flavored split waters. But it is precisely this fragrance that draws very stylishly and elegantly from the polarizing affair. And from the first test on my skin to the third 100 ml bottle, I can only think of positive things about it.
The first squirt. Rose. Rose meets honey and plum. I love the scent of roses, have no less than 14 varieties on my balcony, of course this note catches me. But this rose here has a heavy lust that blends with the sweetness of honey and plum. The oud somehow keeps the back and forth of this love play in the middle. Seldom have I experienced a rose scent so well, so wearably balanced on the unisex level. My impressions coincided with those of others: What are you wearing. But you smell good. You smell nice. Sexy. Yummy. I don't primarily scent myself for others, but when I do, I like to take those real-life likes with me. So he seems to be a big hit with the ladies. At least the ones I socialize with.
New York Oud smells soft and warm and attractive. It has an enormous durability and sillage. Apart from the summer, I find it wearable at any time. But the sweet heaviness is not necessarily something for the office. But a date, gallery or theatre visit is certainly a suitable setting for this fragrance.
But let's get back to the honourable mention. As a fan of roses, the passage from Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" comes to my mind when Juliet wants to say to Romeo that it doesn't matter what name he bears, be it that of the enemy house Montague:
What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.
So I would be interested to know if this rose scent would be better rated if it had a different name. The price level of the Bond fragrances, no matter what, the enormous durability of the bottle will wear you out for a while. If you google and compare, "New York Oud" in particular can sometimes be significantly reduced. Then you'll have a chic flacon standing in your home walls. And no matter what name is on the bottle, there's a pretty nice, pretty sensual, pretty good scent in it.
Of course, the scents of Bond No. 9 are not exactly bargains. They are often noisy and sometimes equally synthetic, olfactory flavored split waters. But it is precisely this fragrance that draws very stylishly and elegantly from the polarizing affair. And from the first test on my skin to the third 100 ml bottle, I can only think of positive things about it.
The first squirt. Rose. Rose meets honey and plum. I love the scent of roses, have no less than 14 varieties on my balcony, of course this note catches me. But this rose here has a heavy lust that blends with the sweetness of honey and plum. The oud somehow keeps the back and forth of this love play in the middle. Seldom have I experienced a rose scent so well, so wearably balanced on the unisex level. My impressions coincided with those of others: What are you wearing. But you smell good. You smell nice. Sexy. Yummy. I don't primarily scent myself for others, but when I do, I like to take those real-life likes with me. So he seems to be a big hit with the ladies. At least the ones I socialize with.
New York Oud smells soft and warm and attractive. It has an enormous durability and sillage. Apart from the summer, I find it wearable at any time. But the sweet heaviness is not necessarily something for the office. But a date, gallery or theatre visit is certainly a suitable setting for this fragrance.
But let's get back to the honourable mention. As a fan of roses, the passage from Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" comes to my mind when Juliet wants to say to Romeo that it doesn't matter what name he bears, be it that of the enemy house Montague:
What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.
So I would be interested to know if this rose scent would be better rated if it had a different name. The price level of the Bond fragrances, no matter what, the enormous durability of the bottle will wear you out for a while. If you google and compare, "New York Oud" in particular can sometimes be significantly reduced. Then you'll have a chic flacon standing in your home walls. And no matter what name is on the bottle, there's a pretty nice, pretty sensual, pretty good scent in it.
4 Comments
Hermesh
Farouha
