Wild Dsquared² 2014 Eau de Toilette

See Prices

More

We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

See Prices

6.4 / 10 74 Ratings

Wild (Eau de Toilette) is a perfume by Dsquared² for men and was released in 2014. The scent is fresh-woody. It was last marketed by Angelini Beauty.
Pronunciation

More

We may earn a commission when you buy from links on our site, including the eBay Partner Network and Amazon.

Main accords

Fresh

Woody

Spicy

Citrus

Synthetic

Fragrance Notes

Opoponax Santolina

Labdanum

Vegetal amber

Humus

Resinous notes

Perfumers

Daphné Bugey, Annick Ménardo, Firmenich

Videos

Watch video

Ratings

Scent

6.474 Ratings

Longevity

6.158 Ratings

Sillage

5.458 Ratings

Bottle

6.574 Ratings

Submitted by Michael, last update on 12.10.2022.

Reviews

3 in-depth fragrance descriptions

10/22/2020

5
Bottle 6
Sillage 9
Longevity 7
Scent

AaronMulle
13 Reviews

Translated Show original

AaronMulle

Less helpful Review

Wild... too wild!

I bought it for the first time for the release and fell in love. At that time I was younger, immature and playful. So you can smell the scent am
Describe it best. He really gives you a kick in the teeth! Unfortunately without coming into balance. He doesn't really change over time. He gets more and more annoying, boring and penetrating hour after hour. For young people who want to attract attention it is certainly a great buy. With me it lifts really eternally what one must be called too good with the price. But for men who know what they want it is simply no longer up to date. I only use it when it goes to the sport.

04/13/2020

7
Bottle 7
Sillage 7
Longevity 6.5
Scent

TomFragance
34 Reviews

TomFragance

Wild? Why?

A tooooo minimal fragrance, maybe even too much. The opening is interesting, a nice fresh cypress, lots of wood and lots of citrus fruits, and on the surface a touch of amber and a ton of iso and super, and then ... enough. mild seasons, but not a perfume that makes your head spin, considering also stillage and scarce duration.
A fresh woody too poor of grit. What will it have then Wild? NOTHING

Rating: 6.5

06/12/2019

7
Bottle 7
Sillage 7
Longevity 8.5
Scent

Norleans
60 Reviews

Translated Show original

Norleans

Helpful Review 6

Oh yeah, this scent here was cheap to get, but is it inferior because of that?

Now a 60% approval is not bad mathematically yet. But with Parfumo, it's already a stigma for a perfume.
A few years ago I had the smallest bottle size at home and I used it up to the end. Every morning before I went to the office, the left and right were sprayed beautifully fine - and I really liked it.

"Were you at parfumo.de then?" asks my subconscious.
"No, of course not!" says my very sophisticated fragrance snob-today me.

And once again I find myself paying too much attention to the ratings of the fragrances listed here. Wild would have stayed under my radar forever, but it's really okay. It doesn't bother anybody, it doesn't put on too much and it just fit any weather.
When it was used up, a new fragrance was tried out (Yes... funny, how naive I was back then). First use up a bottle before indulging in something new...).
Synthetic? Yeah, but be that as it may, good anyway. Wild is pleasing, fresh, slightly woody, compatible with other people and cheap. I can't remember the scents listed today. I've really tested much better rated fragrances that weren't half as good (in my nose). Wild is not a milestone in the art of perfumery (perhaps a metre), but really worth a try.

I don't want to imagine how many actually good scents I have already clicked away after seeing miserable ratings here. But that's how a perfume maniac works. Whereby, it occurs to me that I also tested Erolfa (6.8) and found it great (after some repetitions). Perhaps one can speak of badly evaluated smells also of a niche, since they also touch "professionals" with us.

Thanks for reading