Top Notes 
Heart Notes 
Base Notes 
12/05/2020
Chizza
273 Reviews
Translated
Show original
Chizza
Top Review
17
Very quickly forgotten
Vibrant, i.e. dynamic, pulsating, a fragrance full of life and esprit. One might think so. Before I get to the fragrance, I share FvSpee's values opinion about the Boadicea the Victorious brand and its release policy. Unfortunately for me, Vibrant is more like his own antagonist, his own antagonist.
The incipient citrus note is not fresh, but immediately blends with the woody and smoky notes. However, these are weakly pronounced, just as the lemon quickly disappears. As if she had made a mistake in the door. Now that this smoke and wood are very lax, we have an overall scent reminiscent of spiced tea.
Now the other evaluations at this point surprise me very much because the fragrance stays with me for a long time, but not very intense. The wood aroma is rather sublimely perceptible, it actually seems to be a nice and rather deep brown wood, which is hidden by the musk veil. The smoke does not come from a fire but rather from resins, myrrh, but it is only gently burned a little bit, single fine lines of smoke float through the air similar to the smoke of a cigarette.
The rose I actually notice is very well staged, as it is robbed of its opulence so that a green severity resonates in the subtext of the fragrance.
By the way, the leather is still missing and only becomes noticeable later on as it develops out of the wood. It is more a soft leather, reminiscent of Bianchi leather. This may not sound very nice, but it is in its entirety. The leather is rather introverted and thus corresponds to the rest of the fragrance, which is rather quiet.
All in all, Vibrant is a good start, unfortunately half-baked and thus useless or disappointing when combined. Unfortunately, I cannot understand the good evaluations, because there are numerous fragrances here that not only have a better H/S, but also use the individual ingredients much better. This leaves me bored, at least Vibrant is much more harmless than I thought. Whether I would spray this on myself as a woman - the fragrance is declared as feminine - rather no
The incipient citrus note is not fresh, but immediately blends with the woody and smoky notes. However, these are weakly pronounced, just as the lemon quickly disappears. As if she had made a mistake in the door. Now that this smoke and wood are very lax, we have an overall scent reminiscent of spiced tea.
Now the other evaluations at this point surprise me very much because the fragrance stays with me for a long time, but not very intense. The wood aroma is rather sublimely perceptible, it actually seems to be a nice and rather deep brown wood, which is hidden by the musk veil. The smoke does not come from a fire but rather from resins, myrrh, but it is only gently burned a little bit, single fine lines of smoke float through the air similar to the smoke of a cigarette.
The rose I actually notice is very well staged, as it is robbed of its opulence so that a green severity resonates in the subtext of the fragrance.
By the way, the leather is still missing and only becomes noticeable later on as it develops out of the wood. It is more a soft leather, reminiscent of Bianchi leather. This may not sound very nice, but it is in its entirety. The leather is rather introverted and thus corresponds to the rest of the fragrance, which is rather quiet.
All in all, Vibrant is a good start, unfortunately half-baked and thus useless or disappointing when combined. Unfortunately, I cannot understand the good evaluations, because there are numerous fragrances here that not only have a better H/S, but also use the individual ingredients much better. This leaves me bored, at least Vibrant is much more harmless than I thought. Whether I would spray this on myself as a woman - the fragrance is declared as feminine - rather no
13 Comments
