08/19/2021
Splitter
50 Reviews
Translated
Show original
Splitter
5
My name is Rose
As has already been mentioned, this is not one of those dead-mixed rose-oud scents that you get really bored of. This one is a distinctive, very oldschool rose composition that is already very typically rose pungent to me at the outset, with a hint of not-so-clean-smelling excrement. I feel a bit reminded of those aspects of the old Dodo (2019).
And hey, I just took a whiff of the spray. Okay, I dare you. Up with it.
A bit of anxiety sets in, because inconspicuous this one definitely isn't. But I don't have to go out today, so we'll just try it. And should I still go out and somehow be missed, on 20km no similar fragrance is running around and the sillage is hard.
I can also clearly say that there was no Lush product in a long time, in which this fragrance was used, as is sometimes the case. Flower's Barrow is known to be the scent from the Blousey shampoo.
But what this scent is definitely in the 2020s is bold. And looking at the price Lush is pulling down... dangerous.
So after that badass rose note slowly dissipates, you're met with a soapy component led by neroli and wood. Not the typical creamy that sandalwood so brings, but the dirtier side of it. Nevertheless, rounding and soothing.
Yes, salt is there, too. Why anyway. Already in the whisky world, there's disagreement about whether you can smell salt or saltiness at all, because salt doesn't actually have a smell. Anyway. It has the impression of a salty aura. No algae, no sea.
One and a half to two hours after spraying on, a very unusual chyprenote comes to work, which is complex but not profound. The fragrance is linear, about one and a half hours very intense, then two more clearly in the sillage and the next five to 6 hours skin deep; kept simple, strong in the effect, soapy and dirty at the same time, retro unparalleled and really brave. But since he first came on the market in 1989, one can rather understand his composition.
But since I can never empty this bottle alone, get in touch!
And hey, I just took a whiff of the spray. Okay, I dare you. Up with it.
A bit of anxiety sets in, because inconspicuous this one definitely isn't. But I don't have to go out today, so we'll just try it. And should I still go out and somehow be missed, on 20km no similar fragrance is running around and the sillage is hard.
I can also clearly say that there was no Lush product in a long time, in which this fragrance was used, as is sometimes the case. Flower's Barrow is known to be the scent from the Blousey shampoo.
But what this scent is definitely in the 2020s is bold. And looking at the price Lush is pulling down... dangerous.
So after that badass rose note slowly dissipates, you're met with a soapy component led by neroli and wood. Not the typical creamy that sandalwood so brings, but the dirtier side of it. Nevertheless, rounding and soothing.
Yes, salt is there, too. Why anyway. Already in the whisky world, there's disagreement about whether you can smell salt or saltiness at all, because salt doesn't actually have a smell. Anyway. It has the impression of a salty aura. No algae, no sea.
One and a half to two hours after spraying on, a very unusual chyprenote comes to work, which is complex but not profound. The fragrance is linear, about one and a half hours very intense, then two more clearly in the sillage and the next five to 6 hours skin deep; kept simple, strong in the effect, soapy and dirty at the same time, retro unparalleled and really brave. But since he first came on the market in 1989, one can rather understand his composition.
But since I can never empty this bottle alone, get in touch!
3 Comments
