12/05/2020
Chizza
273 Reviews
Translated
Show original
Chizza
Top Review
24
Varied and pleasing
Ma Nishtana from the house of Prin carries above all the Prin-DNA in himself. But not the one from the label Prin, where Mr. Lomros markets his rather daring and rather artistic fragrances, but from his wearable line of perfume Prissana. Häxan is a good example here, which I find extremely suitable for the masses and Ma Nishtana is no different. Mind you: I'm not saying that a fragrance is bad because it is designed for the masses, I'm varying myself, not ambivalent.
Without wanting to anticipate too much, Ma Nishtana is extremely changeable. The fragrance starts with a Badedas attitude, which the allspice turns into a spicy green melange, not too peppery. This phase lasts for a long time, now and then some creatures peep through. This basic tenor then changes and the second and probably longest phase of Ma Nishtana begins.
First of all, you notice the caraway, as it is flanked by a bitter-sweetish something. Yes, it flanks the incense, guides it symbolically through the beginning and then says goodbye immediately.
It remains sacred incense. First I think of Sancti-Eau dela from Liquides Imaginaires but there is no citric note, so that a kindred spirit remains. On the one hand it smells upscale, but then also relatively generic.
Suddenly the incense turns towards the Series 3 of CdG; smells relatively the same. Some see Kyoto as a fragrance twin that I would exclude just like Ouarzate, as they are not so monothematic. But Ma Nishtana respectively this phase of Ma Nishtana does. From memory I would probably compare the Prin product with Avignon.
Overall good but not outstanding. Subjectively, it no longer is. Still, five hours later, I can't smell any incense. Successively a kind of creaminess crept into the fragrance, which slightly irritated me. Now the sandalwood dominates, suddenly the animalism also appears in the form of fine suede. A kind of cocoa aroma forms in this way and reminds me of the bourgeois version of Royal Oud, rough but likeable.
Ma Nishtana is thus an olfactory composition, multi-faceted and extremely divergent in itself. It is also very attractive, although I do not break out in tears of joy. The series is something for Prin fans who find the Prin brand too much.
Without wanting to anticipate too much, Ma Nishtana is extremely changeable. The fragrance starts with a Badedas attitude, which the allspice turns into a spicy green melange, not too peppery. This phase lasts for a long time, now and then some creatures peep through. This basic tenor then changes and the second and probably longest phase of Ma Nishtana begins.
First of all, you notice the caraway, as it is flanked by a bitter-sweetish something. Yes, it flanks the incense, guides it symbolically through the beginning and then says goodbye immediately.
It remains sacred incense. First I think of Sancti-Eau dela from Liquides Imaginaires but there is no citric note, so that a kindred spirit remains. On the one hand it smells upscale, but then also relatively generic.
Suddenly the incense turns towards the Series 3 of CdG; smells relatively the same. Some see Kyoto as a fragrance twin that I would exclude just like Ouarzate, as they are not so monothematic. But Ma Nishtana respectively this phase of Ma Nishtana does. From memory I would probably compare the Prin product with Avignon.
Overall good but not outstanding. Subjectively, it no longer is. Still, five hours later, I can't smell any incense. Successively a kind of creaminess crept into the fragrance, which slightly irritated me. Now the sandalwood dominates, suddenly the animalism also appears in the form of fine suede. A kind of cocoa aroma forms in this way and reminds me of the bourgeois version of Royal Oud, rough but likeable.
Ma Nishtana is thus an olfactory composition, multi-faceted and extremely divergent in itself. It is also very attractive, although I do not break out in tears of joy. The series is something for Prin fans who find the Prin brand too much.
19 Comments