Top Notes 
Heart Notes 
Base Notes 
12/12/2020
DN1982
29 Reviews
Translated
Show original
DN1982
2
Not so bad - but unfortunately not very durable
When they say synthetic-aquatic, that's usually a reason for me to run away screaming, because usually the search for something good from one of these two genres is something like looking for the (not) existing needle in the haystack. But should I carelessly throw away the samples that were in my package from S. Oliver?
In fact, the prelude is a little daunting: I wondered why Sidolin is now also available as an eau de toilette - from the pre-reformulated era, of course. But that goes by quite quickly, cardamom and pink pepper don't want to know anything about window cleaning.
The rosemary does really well here - in a classic way, i like! I have basic problems with moss: if it's missing, I notice it immediately, but as a single note it's hard for me to smell, it's the kind of note that forms the net without playing along in front. I have the impression that the head and base quickly intertwine, or rather, the base levels in early on before it retreats again and celebrates the Rosemary-Moss Duo Classic pure. Interesting here is also that the cedar doesn't appear too dry, but contributes a slightly resinous note, which is never the case otherwise.
Yes, this fragrance corresponds to the genre mentioned. However, practically everything on the market that is synthetic and/or aquatic is completely out of level in at least one component, making it a real nerve killer. Here, however, a well-balanced mixture with quite classic borrowings shows up, which makes it a good all-rounder. However, the boy lacks endurance and range and not too little! Is it simply a matter of saving money and does it really have to be called Eau de Cologne? Or do the syntheticians and aquaticists first have to give some of their composition the nerve-killer so that in the end endurance and range are the result? Here I clearly miss a bit of "pressure", although this fragrance is really not to be sneezed at.
In fact, the prelude is a little daunting: I wondered why Sidolin is now also available as an eau de toilette - from the pre-reformulated era, of course. But that goes by quite quickly, cardamom and pink pepper don't want to know anything about window cleaning.
The rosemary does really well here - in a classic way, i like! I have basic problems with moss: if it's missing, I notice it immediately, but as a single note it's hard for me to smell, it's the kind of note that forms the net without playing along in front. I have the impression that the head and base quickly intertwine, or rather, the base levels in early on before it retreats again and celebrates the Rosemary-Moss Duo Classic pure. Interesting here is also that the cedar doesn't appear too dry, but contributes a slightly resinous note, which is never the case otherwise.
Yes, this fragrance corresponds to the genre mentioned. However, practically everything on the market that is synthetic and/or aquatic is completely out of level in at least one component, making it a real nerve killer. Here, however, a well-balanced mixture with quite classic borrowings shows up, which makes it a good all-rounder. However, the boy lacks endurance and range and not too little! Is it simply a matter of saving money and does it really have to be called Eau de Cologne? Or do the syntheticians and aquaticists first have to give some of their composition the nerve-killer so that in the end endurance and range are the result? Here I clearly miss a bit of "pressure", although this fragrance is really not to be sneezed at.
