LaNezFine

LaNezFine

Reviews
LaNezFine 3 years ago 1 1
7
Bottle
7
Sillage
8
Longevity
4.5
Scent
Translated Show original Show translation
Synthetic anything
I don't.
I just do not know what he should be and wants to be. This fragrance is a homogeneous, unisex sweet mush that does not try to hide his syntethik, but just brags about it, to get even yes attention. And he manages that, both sillage and durability can be seen, the lack of which in this chemical cocktail but would also be disappointing.
This DNA smells as if one has let an intern brew a broth with the soup ladle at Paco & Rabane, then slaps the Alien logo on it and served without seasoning.
For me, a clear no-go.
---------------------------------------------------
Conclusion for lazy:
- sweet synthetics
- no clearly recognizable line, no development
- good H/S
1 Comment
LaNezFine 3 years ago 12 3
6
Bottle
7
Sillage
7
Longevity
7
Scent
Translated Show original Show translation
Such a big ball of fire boy! ..... Oh what gentle seduction!
Greetings people of noses! This is my first review of a fragrance on this platform. Should this be celebrated? I feel like it but whatever. Let's get to the main course.

First, you should probably know that this was a blind purchase on my part.
The name is so inspiring...sigh.
My expectations were also clearly framed based on the scent pyramid with dryness, spiciness and pungency. In the end, he surprised me anyway.
So sprayed on, waited for the drydown and...RUMMS.
Silence.
Wow.
An incredible blast of sandalwood hit my sensitive and moody olfactory organ completely unprepared. At the beginning, he fires straight from all pipes: Bergamot on the surface, a muscular body of sandalwood and spicy peaks of musk just about overwhelmed.
Only after some time, the sandalwood loses some energy and the various notes go into a creamy flowing balance, which is incredibly fun, while the fragrance always remains linear during its circa 7 hours of life.
Should you get this fragrance?
As a fragrance freak, I scream "yes!"
Why?
Its unusualness and rarely experienced creaminess make it exciting and desirable to battle-hardened noses. However, one should endure, even like, sandalwood.
Would I recommend it to a fragrance novice?
Clear no.
Too unusual and overwhelming. This is not a perfume, which can be worn carefree.

So how was I? Did you enjoy it? I did. *Pat on the back*
3 Comments
LaNezFine 3 years ago 4
2
Bottle
6
Sillage
6
Longevity
6
Scent
Translated Show original Show translation
spicy metal cucumber
Ralph Lauren's reputation in the perfume industry is not the best for a number of reasons. However, I do not want to discuss this too much, since it is about the fragrance and not about brand arguments.
Because: often that is justified, but not with this fragrance.
To the bottle:
Under all sow. Absolutely unwieldy, you get when spraying almost a cramp.
Safety note: Take two hands.
The only positive here is the great blue.
To the fragrance:
It convinces by persistent freshness, whereby the cucumber note appears very dominant and makes up the bulk of the aquatic and remains through the entire course of the fragrance.
On the cucumber one perceives especially crackling basil, which tickles the nose first.
The carrier of the structure is then a not heavy but nevertheless sharp and certain musk note, which mixes with woods and creates a slightly metallic undertone.
H/S:
I was actually surprised by the longevity. For an aquatic stable 6 hours can be expected here.
With the sillage one fills no room but attracts enough attention.
Conclusion:
Who stands on special fragrances (cucumber) and his olfactory bulb like to surprise will find here and may be pleased about tingling-spicy freshness
For the summer an absolutely stable middle class fragrance with that certain something and in my opinion remains a positive memory.

0 Comments