Timboeck

The similarity to DHC is unmistakable, but I find DHC even finer balanced. AHSC is for me however clearly before the two to place. It is somewhat more complex and has a fine herbaceous note which the Vibrant Leather Cologne mMn completely lacks.

To the fragrance:
It opens very citric with a slight synthetic note that weakens slightly over time. The fragrance is rather linear and not very complex.

For the summer a good and very cheap citrus freshener. I learned to love him.

I was looking for a fragrance for spring and risked to get some advice again. After convincing me of a few of the saleswoman's rather unsuccessful salesmen (I know why I usually test on my own), she showed me Wood for him. With the words: "It's very special and very woody, you have to like it" she began to spray. My first impression was; citric, not bad, but not woody. I thanked the saleswoman and told her that I still had some work to do and that the perfume would continue to work for me. To cut a long story short, it just fit! However, after about 4 hours I noticed that the wood notes were not more pronounced than with many other fragrances without wood in the name. I would also like to mention that my nose has a certain resemblance to Prada Luna Rossa Eau Sport, which I chose a few years ago as my summer scent, but warmer and still woody.

A citric start that quickly turns into a green-warm heart note. The tonka bean in the base note is (fortunately) hardly perceptible to me. For me a great companion in autumn. H+S with me unfortunately only mediocrity.